Validation, Quality Control, Regulations...Why?

The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Breast Cancer Predictive Markers. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Breast Cancer Predictive Markers (online CE course)
Validation, Quality Control, Regulations...Why?

Physicians and patients rely on accurate diagnostic testing from the clinical and anatomic pathology laboratories. Analytical validation is essential to ensure that an assay performs as expected and accurately identifies and/or quantifies measurable values or qualitative aspects of human disease. Established guidelines and stringent quality control are essential for the reproducibility of test results.
Studies have revealed inconsistencies in test validations and test results between laboratories. This is a serious concern, but especially alarming when it affects predictive marker tests since they directly affect clinical treatment decisions. The American Society of Clinical Oncologists (ASCO), a guiding organization of medical oncologists, and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) have worked together to develop collaborative guidelines for use with predictive markers. The guidelines cover all aspects of laboratory testing, including quality control, interpretation, and reporting. The hope is that these collaborative and coordinated efforts will effectively address concerns with test accuracy.