Interpretation and Discussion

How to Subscribe
MLS & MLT Comprehensive CE Package
Includes 178 CE courses, most popular
$109Add to cart
Pick Your Courses
Up to 8 CE hours
$55Add to cart
Individual course$25Add to cart
Need multiple seats for your university or lab? Get a quote
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Case Studies in Hematology - Nonmalignant WBC Disorders. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Case Studies in Hematology - Nonmalignant WBC Disorders (online CE course)
Interpretation and Discussion

True basophilia is an uncommon finding in hematology labs. If a manual count differs from the automated count, it is often due to inexperienced laboratorians identifying neutrophils with toxic granulation as basophils; it has even been my experience that students will sometimes identify small lymphocytes as basophils. However, in this case, the analyzer results were higher than those from the manual differential. The CLSI standard for determining basophil count is to count at least 400 cells (200 each on two smears) because of the low numbers and, thus, the possibility of statistical error. It is unknown in this case whether the manual count was based on 400 cells.
Reactive basophilia is fairly uncommon. When the basophil count exceeds the reference range, the main reason for concern is a myeloproliferative disease such as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or sometimes a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). It is important to differentiate reactive from malignant.
The situation is that basophil counts can sometimes be spuriously high or low, depending on the hematology analyzer used.
The following pages will review some possible causes of spurious results, summarize reactive and neoplastic causes, and mention how to differentiate the two.