Home Products Most Popular Contact
No items in your cart.
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Overview Of Major Antigens of the Rh Blood Group System. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Overview Of Major Antigens of the Rh Blood Group System (online CE course) »
How to Subscribe
MLS & MLT Comprehensive CE Package
Includes 111 CE courses, most popular
$95 Add to cart
Pick Your Courses
Up to 8 CE hours
$50 Add to cart
Individual course$20 Add to cart

Mechanism 3: Partial D

In this mechanism various epitopes of the D protein are missing or altered. The red cells of some of these individuals may have weak or missing reactivity during routine testing with anti-D reagents, whereas others may show normal reactivity when typing with anti-D. This was first noted when individuals who had been typed as D positive formed anti-D.
The theory of Wiener and Unger is that the D antigen was made of antigenic subparts that could be absent and that the resulting alloantibody behaved as anti-D during routine testing. This explanation has become well accepted.
Tippett and Sanger performed further studies resulting in the categorization of partial D, represented by Roman numerals I through VII. Category I has been deleted and several categories have been subdivided based on more sophisticated molecular testing methods.
Classifications of partial D are now made on the molecular level and are thought to be hybrid genes resulting from the replacement of sections of the RHD gene with sections of the RHCE gene. The protein changes occur external to the red cell membrane, therefore when an individual with these altered proteins is exposed to normal D antigens during transfusion, they can make antibody to the part of the RhD protein that they lack. This antibody may cause hemolytic disease of the newborn or hemolytic transfusion reactions. Once identified, these individuals must receive Rh negative blood products during transfusion. Most commonly these individuals are recognized following production of anti-D. In a few cases a D typing discrepancy may lead to further investigation. For example, a donor whose samples have tested D positive on multiple visits may surprisingly type as D negative. Further investigation may include a review of the records for changes in testing method and/or reagent antisera used. As in the case of weak D, the information in the reagent antisera's direction circular is crucial to understanding the potential for discrepancies in D typing.

Harmening, DM,: Modern Blood Banking & Transfusion Practices, 6th ed. FA Davis, Philadelphia, PA, 2012, p 158-160.
Blaney, KD and Howard, PR: Basic & Applied Concepts of Blood Banking and Transfusion Practices, 3rd ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2013, p 112-116.