Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Versus Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Need multiple seats for your university or lab? Get a quote
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer (online CE course)
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Versus Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Despite developments of specific molecular markers, immunohistochemistry staining remains a vital component of laboratory testing for the demonstration of gene amplification.
  • Patients with 0 to 1+ IHC staining are more than likely negative for HER2 gene amplification
  • Patients with 3+ IHC staining are more than likely positive for HER2 gene amplification
The benefits of IHC staining include low cost and rapid turnaround time.

Patients with 2+ IHC staining are not reliably negative or positive for HER2 gene amplification. Therefore, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) testing must be performed for gene enumeration in 2+ cases. In 3% of cases, protein expression does not correlate with gene amplification.
The primary benefit of FISH testing is accuracy. Drawbacks of FISH methods include high complexity of test performance, high cost of the test, storage/archival over any extended amount of time causes loss of signal and slides are interpretable, and need for a specialized microscope.