Home Products Most Popular Contact
No items in your cart.
The page below is a sample from the LabCE course Molecular Methods in Clinical Microbiology. Access the complete course and earn ASCLS P.A.C.E.-approved continuing education credits by subscribing online.

Learn more about Molecular Methods in Clinical Microbiology (online CE course) »
How to Subscribe
MLS & MLT Comprehensive CE Package
Includes 123 CE courses, most popular
$95 Add to cart
Pick Your Courses
Up to 8 CE hours
$50 Add to cart
Individual course$20 Add to cart

Courtesy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

2009 - Swine Flu

The 2009 H1N1 influenza virus was first detected in the United States on April 15, 2009.

The virus was a unique combination of influenza virus genes never previously identified in either animals or people; they were most closely related to swine-lineage H1N1 viruses (hence the designation of "swine influenza"). However, epidemiological investigations of initial human cases did not identify exposures to pigs and it became apparent that this new virus was circulating among humans and not among U.S. pig herds.

By April 21, 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began working on development of a new vaccine effective against this new strain. On April 24, 2009, the CDC uploaded complete gene sequences of the 2009 H1N1 virus to a publicly accessible international influenza database. At the same time vaccine development was occurring, work was also being done at CDC to help laboratories more quickly identify the 2009 H1N1 virus in patient samples. A real time PCR assay developed by the CDC was cleared for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on April 28, 2009.

The development of an effective, rapidly performed molecular assay was critical, because a CDC evaluation of non-molecular rapid influenza assays indicated that while these tests were capable of detecting the novel H1N1 strain when present in high concentrations, the overall sensitivity was low. Positive results with these assays were useful, but negative results did not rule out infection with influenza.