A busy laboratory is located in a 350 bed urban hospital that provides laboratory testing for the hospital and for the hospital's outreach testing program. A medical technologist in the microbiology department receives a call from a friend who works in a laboratory in a physician office. The physician is not a regular client of the laboratory currently but uses another laboratory for most of their work. The microbiologist knows that the sales department would like to get this account. The friend explains to her that she is doing a quality control check on her in-office microbiology testing and her regular laboratory will do it but is going to charge her for it. She asks the microbiologist if she will do it for free since it is quality control, not Medicare, and is not going to be billed to anyone.
She tells the microbiologist that she would like to use the hospital lab for everything but her doctor insists on using the competitor. She indicates that the favor might help get the doctor to try the hospital laboratory for other tests. How should the microbiologist respond to this request?
Correct Answer: Explain to her friend that if the hospital does the tests for no charge on the promise of other referrals, both the physician office and the hospital could be liable for violations of the antikickback statute.
Discussion: The antikickback statute is implicated in this scenario because the free testing is solicited on the condition that other referrals may occur as a result of providing the favor. In fact, the solicitation itself is a violation of the law. The fact that Medicare patients are not specifically mentioned in the scenario is not sufficient to remove the risk. The technologist should also report the incident to the Compliance Officer and seek advice about what documentation, if any, should be kept concerning the incident.